Snowflake announced earlier this month that it might give up its dual-class shareholder construction, a company governance setup that always provides founders and executives superior voting rights, sometimes involving 10 occasions as many votes for their very own shares as others obtain. The mechanism can allow founders to keep up management regardless of later dilution and will generally even grant ironclad management to a person in perpetuity.

For many corporations, these supervoting shares symbolize a extremely {powerful} instrument, permitting founders to have their cake and eat it, too — to go public and obtain the benefits of being a public firm whereas limiting the facility of exterior shareholders to affect how they run the corporate as soon as it floats.

Some founders and their traders argue that these preferred shares protect them from the short-term whims of the market, however the perspective isn’t universally accepted. Dual-class shares are a controversial governance structure, and a few marvel if they’re setting up an unfair enjoying discipline by permitting a cabal to wield outsized energy.

Why would Snowflake give up such a strong instrument a mere six months after it went public? We determined to take a look at the notion of dual-class shares and why Snowflake might have been keen to allow them to go.

Snowflake’s determination

If one of many main functions of dual-class shares is to consolidate CEO energy, then maybe Snowflake felt they weren’t mandatory, given the historical past of CEO-shuffling on the firm. While Snowflake’s founders are nonetheless a part of the group, they employed Sutter Hill investor Mike Speiser to be their first CEO, adopted by former Microsoft exec Bob Muglia earlier than lastly bringing in veteran CEO Frank Slootman to take their firm public.

Without an omnipotent CEO founder in place, maybe the corporate felt that supervoting shares weren’t mandatory. Regardless, Snowflake CFO Mike Scarpelli framed the transfer as a call that works for all events when he introduced that his firm would abandon the particular shares throughout its earnings name earlier this month.

“Today, we announced that on March 1st, 2021, our Class B shareholders in accordance with our governing documents converted all of our Class B common stock to Class A common stock, eliminating the dual-class structure of our common stock and ensuring that each share has an equal vote. We view this as operationally beneficial to the company and our shareholders,” Scarpelli stated during the call.