ASRock Phantom Gaming Radeon RX 6600 XT performance

0
90


There’s nonetheless no finish in sight to the insane graphics card scarcity and ensuing worth spikes which have turned our market the wrong way up. For over a 12 months now, it has been nearly inconceivable to discover a graphics card in India promoting at wherever close to its MSRP – individuals have been pressured to pay double and even triple what is perhaps thought of affordable costs, and second-hand or low-end fashions are sometimes the one selections left to these with out limitless budgets.

We had hoped to see issues enhance on the availability facet with just a little extra competitors because of AMD’s recent resurgence. More choices available in the market ought to imply higher probabilities for customers to search out one thing that works by way of worth and performance. However, whereas AMD’s official price in India is Rs. 31,990 (plus taxes), the state of affairs on the bottom continues to be dire with poor availability and outrageous markups.

We’ve already reviewed the Radeon RX 6800 and Radeon RX 6800XT, that are high-end fashions aimed toward lovers who wish to sport at 4K. Now, a extra reasonably priced spinoff, the Radeon RX 6600 XT, has landed up, and is getting the complete evaluate remedy at this time.

Based on the identical RDNA2 structure as its greater siblings, AMD is concentrating on players who wish to step as much as full-HD 1080p gaming at top quality settings, with a little bit of a push into 1440p and even 4K in much less resource-hungry video games. In a perfect market, this GPU must be a superb improve possibility for anybody with a mainstream graphics card that is three or extra years previous – however how a lot cash must you really be keen to pay for it? Read on to search out out.

The ASRock Phantom Gaming Radeon RX 6600 XT delivers good 1080p performance in most video games

 

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT GPU structure and specs

The Radeon RX 6600 XT is just not probably the most highly effective GPU in its stack, but it surely does promise up-to-date options together with ray tracing, help for FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR) upscaling, DirectX 12 Ultimate, variable charge shading, and HDMI 2.1. These are issues that allow players take pleasure in visible high quality enhancements at comfy body charges and refresh charges, at affordable resolutions. After all, lots of people have 1080p displays and are not even seeking to improve to bigger ones.

The Radeon RX 6600 XT GPU has 2,048 ‘stream processors’ clustered into 32 compute items, every of which additionally has its personal ray accelerator logic. The reference ‘sport clock’ which is the pace when not idling, is 2,359MHz, whereas the utmost enhance clock is 2,589MHz. There’s 32MB of on-die Infinity Cache, which is claimed to be very quick, however there’s a lot much less of it right here than on the Radeon RX 6800 and RX 6800 XT. You additionally get H.264 and H.265 encode/decode plus VP9 and AV1 decode {hardware} acceleration as much as sure resolutions and body charges. Like its siblings, this GPU is fabricated on a 7nm course of. All Radeon RX 6600 XT playing cards can have 8GB of GDDR6 reminiscence on a 128-bit bus for as much as 256GBps of reminiscence bandwidth. AMD suggests a 160W TDP, which could change primarily based on board companions’ customized designs.

AMD has made an attention-grabbing alternative – the Radeon RX 6600 XT makes use of solely eight PCIe lanes. It’s PCIe 4.Zero compliant, so that also provides you a similar bandwidth as 16 lanes of PCIe 3.0, however solely on a platform that helps the newer normal. On an older system, being restricted to eight lanes means you get solely half the theoretical peak PCIe 3.Zero bandwidth, even in an x16 slot. Few GPUs totally saturate their PCIe hyperlinks however this would possibly trigger some slight bottlenecks.

You’ll additionally want a comparatively fashionable PC to make use of AMD’s Smart Access Memory function. This is an implementation of the Resizable BAR (Base Address Register) which permits a CPU to entry your GPU’s total reminiscence capability fairly than the normal 256MB restrict, lowering latency. Some video games can see as much as 10 % higher performance.

radeon rx6600xt top ndtv radeon

The 8-pin PCIe energy connector is on the finish of the circuit board, however the cooler extends a lot farther

 

ASRock Phantom Gaming Radeon RX 6600 XT design and specs

There is not any reference design for this mid-range GPU tier, so all Radeon RX 6600 XT playing cards will ship with customized coolers designed by their producers. ASRock has taken the concept of customisation very critically, and we’ve got quite a bit occurring right here by way of design. First of all, this card is totally huge. It’s 305mm lengthy, which is about 40mm longer than common high-end playing cards, and it’ll cling over the sting of an ordinary ATX motherboard. It’s thick sufficient to dam three slots in your motherboard and can be taller than normal playing cards.

The three followers on the entrance all have notched blades which ought to assist with airflow and noise discount. Only the one within the center has RGB LED lighting – its blades are clear with a frosted end, whereas the opposite two followers have translucent smoky gray blades. Whether its blades are spinning or idle, the central fan’s RGB LEDs are animated in a round sample which seems neat. There’s one other panel on the highest that additionally has RGB LEDs and an ASRock Phantom Gaming brand. You can sync the lights with those on a suitable ASRock motherboard, and tweak them utilizing the downloadable software program management panel.

If you look intently, you may see that the precise PCB of the cardboard is just not greater than 190mm lengthy. The remainder of the area beneath the shroud is occupied completely by aluminium heatsink fins. This additionally makes the only 8-pin PCIe energy connector seem like it is positioned in the midst of the cardboard, but it surely’s on the finish of the particular board the place it must be. The metallic backplate ought to give this whole contraption some rigidity which is nice as a result of it weighs 894g.

ASRock calls this card “OC Edition” on the field however speeds are solely very barely raised over inventory – the sport clock is 2428MHz whereas the enhance clock is 2607MHz. You get three ShowPort 1.Four and one HDMI 2.1 port on the rear. The card comes with plastic mud stoppers for all ports, plus a sled for the PCIe connector, that are good touches, however there’s nothing else within the field. The firm in fact claims to have used high-end parts. AMD’s inventory suggestion is for a 500W energy provide however ASRock has padded that to 550W.

radeon rx6600xt ports ndtv radeon

You get three ShowPorts and one HDMI output, all with plastic mud caps

 

ASRock Phantom Gaming Radeon RX 6600 XT performance

The ASRock Phantom Gaming Radeon RX 6600 XT was offered for testing by AMD, since there are not any reference playing cards. Our normal check bench consists of an AMD Ryzen 2700 CPU, ASRock X470 Taichi Ultimate motherboard, 2x8GB of G.Skill F4-3400C16D-16GSXW DDR4 RAM, a 1TB Samsung 860 Evo SSD, and a Corsair RM650 energy provide. The monitor was a 4K Asus PB287Q. As this can be a PCIe 3.Zero platform, among the advantages of all-new {hardware} as described above cannot be exploited. All the most recent drivers and Windows 10 patches have been utilized on the time of testing.

Synthetic testing lets us examine completely different GPUs with an identical workloads beneath an identical circumstances. The desk beneath outlines how the brand new Radeon RX 6600 XT GPU fared towards its prime competitors, the GeForce RTX 3060, in addition to a number of different reference factors in these industry-standard checks.

  ASRock Phantom Gaming Radeon RX 6600 XT Asus Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super Founders Edition AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
3DMark DLSS Feature Test (off / on) N/A 23.67fps / 58.94fps 32.06fps / 79.31fps N/A N/A
3DMark Port Royal 4,398 5,105 6,911 4,998 N/A
3DMark Time Spy 8,557 8,485 10,719 8,771 7,794
3DMark Time Spy Extreme 4,031 3,925 5,058 4,044 3,521
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme 11,695 9,851 13,334 10,049 10,221
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra 6,421 5,182 7,304 4,552 5,355
3DMark Ray Tracing Feature Test 11.16fps 19.8fps 27.2fps N/A N/A
Unigine Superposition (4K Optimised) 7,058 6,912 9,587 N/A N/A

Middle Earth: Shadow of War managed a mean of 40fps operating at its Ultra high quality preset at 4K, however there have been some dips with the bottom level touching 15fps and highs going as much as 152fps, as reported by the built-in benchmark software. Bringing the decision all the way down to 1440p allowed the common to rise to a really respectable 70fps.

Metro: Exodus comes with a separate benchmarking software. Running at 1080p with the Extreme preset, the common body charge was 38.49fps, which exhibits that even at this decision, some video games can push too arduous for this GPU. Stepping all the way down to the Ultra preset raised the body charge common to 64.5fps, and at Normal high quality, that rose once more to 89.06fps. Moving on to Troy: A Total War Saga’s Battle benchmark mode, the common body charge was 21.5fps at 4K and Ultra high quality. Choosing the extra reasonable High high quality setting at 1080p resulted in a mean of 50.02fps.

Far Cry 5 ran at 70fps on common at 1080p, 63fps at 1440p, and 49fps at 4K, utilizing the Ultra preset. Assassin’s Creed: Odyssey is a little more demanding, and ran at 34fps on common at 4K. It took a step down in decision to 1440p in addition to lowering the picture high quality to the High preset to get a mean of 42fps.

Playing by one among Doom Eternal’s Master Levels, this sport confirmed simply how nicely it will probably run even on mid-range {hardware}. With the standard set to Ultra Nightmare and the decision at 4K, this sport had no hassle pushing out a strong 60+fps whereas operating round, and solely dipped to about 50fps in intense battles. There was just a little gentle tearing however no main stutters. The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt additionally performed easily at round 95fps whereas strolling round, with the decision set to 1440p and each graphics and post-processing set to High.

Mid-range {hardware} is a superb use case for AMD’s new FidelityFX Super Resolution function which permits video games to be rendered at decrease resolutions after which use software program upscaling to look sharper with out placing pressure on a GPU. This function is gaining developer help, however there aren’t an enormous variety of video games on the market but which have applied it. Running at 1440p and utilizing the Ultra High preset with out FSR enabled, Anno 1800’s in-game benchmark reported a mean body charge of 52.94fps. At the Ultra Quality FSR stage, that went as much as 71.03fps, and on the Performance stage, the outcome was a exceptional 100.83fps. Image high quality did degrade visibly on the Performance stage, however as you’ll be able to see, you do not have to go to this excessive to have a really playable expertise.

Godfall can be one of many first FSR-enabled video games. Set to 1440p on the Epic high quality preset, the sport managed 35.2fps which isn’t as easy as most players would love. The Ultra Performance FSR stage took that as much as 52.7fps which was fairly a bit higher. Performance mode introduced that as much as a really substantial 70.3fps, however with main loss in picture high quality. You would possibly wish to mess around with sport high quality in addition to FSR stage settings to discover a stability.

The ASRock Phantom Gaming Radeon RX 6600 XT makes use of its huge heatsink successfully, and so the three followers make barely any sound when gaming. They would possibly spin

radeon rx6600xt lights ndtv radeon

The RGB LED results won’t be to everybody’s tastes however they’re controllable in software program

 

as much as their highest pace solely when actually careworn in benchmarks, besides there is not any noise. When not wanted, the followers spin down and keep utterly silent. There’s additionally no jet of scorching air being pushed out the again.

 

Verdict

The Radeon RX 6600 XT GPU is usually on par with or marginally quicker than the GeForce RTX 3060. It is available in at a barely greater official MSRP, and though that is already rather a lot for a GPU on the 1080p stage, it might need been comprehensible in regular occasions. However, the easy reality is that MSRPs imply completely nothing proper now. While extraordinarily tough, it’s not less than doable to purchase Nvidia’s Founders’ Edition playing cards immediately from the distributor in India at its official worth, and AMD presents no such association. In the open market, the ASRock Phantom Gaming Radeon RX 6600 XT sells for barely over Rs. 60,000 which is plainly ludicrous. One different model, Sapphire, has a Radeon RX 6600 XT mannequin listed on-line at round Rs. 48,000, however most others are priced nearer to the ASRock card. On prime of that, they’re all out of inventory.

Although AMD has delivered good performance, there is not any fast or simple option to get it into the fingers of Indian players. It’s a pity, as a result of this might have been a good time for players, with loads of high-profile titles on the horizon, and options like ray tracing and FSR that give individuals higher experiences than they could have anticipated.

The Radeon RX 6600 XT is just not a nasty GPU, however the MSRP is already pushing the restrict of how a lot you must pay for one if you will discover it. ASRock’s Phantom Gaming card, particularly, can be a superb candidate, so long as you will have a roomy PC case and just like the seems of it, however the GPU is extra of a differentiating issue than the model promoting you a graphics card primarily based on it.

ASRock Phantom Gaming Radeon RX 6600 XT
Price: Rs. 60,400 (MOP)

Pros

  • Good performance at 1080p and better in some video games
  • Quiet followers, no noise 

Cons

  • Extremely costly 
  • Oversized, heavy cooler

Ratings (out of 5)

  • Performance: 4
  • Value for Money: 2
  • Overall: 3



Source link